Specification guidance for construction
When writing architectural specifications getting the basics in place from the start will help you build a document suitable to your needs. Listed below are some basic rules to follow when writing your next specification:
- Always edit your specification to reflect your appointment and the selected procurement route.
- Always start from a solid baseline document. Do not take the last project you prepared a specification for and change the headers and footers. No matter how vigilant you are, mistakes such as naming the wrong project, specifying incorrect materials and other basic errors will creep into your documents.
- Avoid using the term 'or similar approved' in a specification. If you approve it you are assuming liability for it. Instead use the term ‘or acceptable equivalent’. By accepting an alternative the responsibility for Fitness for Purpose moves to the contractor and the architect's acceptance is for design intent only. If the architect approves, they take back that responsibility. Normally, alternatives are offered for program or cost reasons and the contractor is responsible for the fact that they are providing a different product that must be at least as good quality-wise as the one specified by the architect. If the architect is specifying by description only, the contractor is obliged to provide the technical solution which again they have to be responsible for in terms of quality, performance, appearance and fitness for purpose.
- The proper use of defined terms is important in a specification. Check your contract.
- Document/section identification should appear on every page in the footer for document control purposes.
- Avoid putting specification clause numbers on your drawings. The use of product reference codes is recommended which should all be included on a technical reference sheet (T-Sheet) that links the drawings and the specification. This makes life much easier when changes are required.
- Avoid mixing prescriptive and performance specifications, that is, don’t name a very specific product and then provide performance characteristics for that product – this is not necessary and creates the potential for conflict resulting in claims.
- Avoid specifying temporary works – this is the contractor’s responsibility. Just specify the need to protect adequately, not how to do it.
- Remove names of individuals when specifying products and just provide the company’s details.
- Remove unfinished clauses and terms such as 'if required'. If you are specifying a specific technical solution then you have to specify everything.
- Do not highlight particular clauses by using bold or underlining, as this indicates that the clause is of special importance and there is no such thing in a specification, as by default it indicates that everything else is not so important.
- Always allow time to have your specifications proof-read.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Bill of quantities.
- Common Arrangement of Work Sections (CAWS).
- Comparison of SMM7 with NRM2.
- Final specifications.
- Insulation specification.
- New Rules of Measurement (NRM)
- Output-based specification.
- Outline specification.
- Performance specification.
- Prescriptive specification.
- Procurement.
- Specification.
- Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7).
- Tender documentation.
- What should be included in a scope of work?
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.